Boats or Goats?
Early on the morning of Saturday February 7, to escape the heat radiating through the windows of my east-facing apartment, I retreated to my local High Street café. Although it has an airconditioner, the old device grunted and sputtered, struggling to cope with the rapidly rising temperature outside. I ordered coffee and spread the weekend broadsheet out on the table. Plastered in bold across the front page was a warning that, with a combination of 43 degree temperatures and gusty northerlies across an already dry state, this was to be a day ‘as bad as you can imagine’. The premier issued advice to Victorians not to go out unless absolutely necessary. We now know too well how justified the fears were, with temperatures soaring more than 3 degrees above the forecast, leading to the worst bushfires Australia has ever seen.
On that morning, still nursing a vague hope that the dreadful predictions might be overly pessimistic, I turned the page to read about the global economic crisis and the Australian government’s proposed $42 billion stimulus package. A photographic ‘vox pop’ asked a range of Australians how they would spend the cash handouts that would comprise part of the package. Acknowledging the need to spend the money (after all, it was designed to ‘stimulate’ the economy) they responded with, “Pay off bills and credit cards, buy an iPod, a romantic dinner out, a boat (!)...etc.” If the proposal was approved, I realised, then as one of the multitudes of Australians earning less than $100,000 a year, I would be eligible for a payment. Unsure what to make of this, but inevitably imagining what I might do with the cash, I took another sip of my latte. The heat felt ominous.
Turning to the opinion pages, I came across a piece by Simon Moyle, a colleague of mine at Urban Seed. Reflecting on our work with people in the grip of drug or gambling addictions, his article posed that global warming, linked to our society’s dependence on cheap energy, might also be understood in terms of addiction. The same dynamic is at work. “Rudd's recent ‘consume our way out of recession’ policies are a perfect example,” Simon wrote, referring to the cash handouts. “Despite the fact that we know our overconsumption is accelerating global warming, this Government, which was elected on taking "real action on climate change", is encouraging us to buy more, consume more… Yet without the Earth there is no human life and no economy.” These words proved more poignant than on any other day.
Finishing my coffee, stepping outside the café, I was assaulted by a blast of suffocating, hairdryer-like air, I considered where I might go to spend the day in airconditioned comfort. The local shopping centre? Mea Culpa.
Over the next 24 hours, the surreal, horrific effects began to reveal themselves. I heard many people say that Saturday afternoon felt apocalyptic. By Sunday morning the cool change had well and truly arrived, but the wind change it brought with it did not bode well for the fires. I spoke to my friend Sarah who told me shakily that a close friend of her husband, who had been visiting his parents in one of the affected regions, had been missing overnight. She knocked on my door a couple of hours later, ashen-faced. “They found his body,” she told me. Without the Earth there is no human life and no economy. We hugged and wept.
During the terrible week that followed we were warned that, with global temperatures set to rise further, fires like these would only become more common during Victorian summers. I continued to return to Simon’s article. He is no more of an expert on global warming or economic policy than I am. But he is a passionate follower of Jesus who has sought to ‘be the change he wants to see’ in the world through slow, costly, patient action in his life. He is convinced of the power of symbolic action. His gut tells him that what we need are not policies to reinforce our destructive habits, but communities animated by hope, able to imagine an alternative future. Communities who remind each other not to put blind faith in any human-made economic system. Communities who remember that the only ‘real’ economy is the earth, to which we must pay the greatest respect.
A week later, the package to stimulate the economy was approved. After adopting the changes negotiated in the Senate, $12 billion was allocated for one-off cash bonuses. For example if you, like me, have a taxable income of less than $80,000, you will receive a payment of $900. There is wide disagreement on whether this is good economics, or good politics for that matter. Not many people remind us of what a letter from Tear Australia reminded me recently: that 40 million people worldwide are predicted to fall into dire poverty as a result of the global credit crisis. Most of them aren’t earning 40, 60 or 80,000 a year.
Well might we listen to advice that it is our civic duty to spend the money before “the global economic recession wreaks havoc” on our country. Yet as I understand it, the global ‘credit’ crisis is nothing more than a crisis of debt. A crisis brought about by an addiction to consumption. This crisis is being tackled with a package that requires our government to borrow more money from our children. And research released yesterday confirmed that more than a third of the payments made as part of the Government’s $8.7 billion stimulus in December were used for extra payments on credit cards. Is something wrong here?
I am part of Loam, a Seeds community in

